![]() The three goals called back were due to reckless play (fouls) on set pieces. The one goal they scored was on a set piece outside the box on a handball call. The truth of the matter is that it could have easily been 3-0 in favor of VDA if the opportunities were finished.but it could have never been the other way around because FCV had one legit (maybe 2) shots on goal. So does VDA and that’s why the game is played. And yes, many people not associated with either team were watching.to include Loudoun players and parents. There wasn’t a person that watched that game that didn’t walk away saying VDA was the better team. VDA out possessed, out shot, out defended and all around out played FCV on that particular day. One reversed goal could be argued as a foul. Spoken like someone who hasn't seen the film. With that aside, it was good game with good players. One of which should have been a straight red. It was a fun one to watch.Īll due respect, it doesn’t count if you continually slam a goalie with the purpose of knocking the ball out her possession. I'd say it was a hard fought game, and the top teams should be playing each other more often in the area. ![]() When was the last time you saw that? VDA has some very good players, FCV has some very good players. FCV had three goals which got called back. I think "owned" is a little optimistic, LOL. VDA 2004 owned that FCV 2004 team, can you imagine what the VDA 2006 team would do? VDA was way more organized, technical and had way more opportunities to score. Only reason why they allowed that FCV 2004 team to play the VDA 2004 team last weekend was they thought it would be an easy game. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |